It seems you're referencing a statement or context involving a former Marathon developer criticizing the-term "extraction shooter," likely in response to how the term has been used or redefined in modern gaming discourse. To clarify: Marathon was a groundbreaking first-person shooter (FPS) series developed by Bungie in the 1990s, known for its deep narrative, complex gameplay, and sci-fi themes. The term "extraction shooter" has become popular in recent years to describe a subgenre of FPS games where the primary objective is to extract a target (often a VIP or data) from a hostile environment, typically under time pressure and heavy combat. Games like Rainbow Six Siege, Escape from Tarkov, and The Division series are often cited as examples. In 2023, former Bungie developer Robert McLeish, who worked on Marathon, spoke out against the use of the term "extraction shooter" in a way that he felt misrepresented the genre's roots. He argued that the term was being overused and misapplied, particularly to describe games that don’t truly capture the narrative depth, player agency, or systemic design that defined classic FPS titles like Marathon. McLeish and others have expressed concern that the term has become a marketing buzzword, often used to sell games that prioritize loot, grinding, and survival mechanics over storytelling and meaningful gameplay. So, in short: "Former Marathon dev decries extraction shooter term" likely refers to a critique of how the genre label has been diluted or misused in modern game marketing, especially by games that borrow the name but not the spirit of what made classic shooters like Marathon great. If you're looking for a full quote or article, this sentiment was widely discussed in gaming forums, Reddit, and outlets like The Verge and Kotaku around late 2023.